From: Keith Garriott <saveevergreenave@gmail.com>Date: December 15, 2010 12:34:04 PM PSTTo: Hannelore Barnes <>, hearus@googlegroups.comCc: hv94941 <hv94941@gmail.com>, charlessands@aol.comSubject: Re: [HEAR US] Evergreen Walk Report
Hi Hanne,
I just read your morning report for Evergreen Avenue traffic andpedestrian interactions.
I was a bit confussed about your where abouts on Evergreen Ave betweenScott and Montford....do you mean Scott and Hawthorne?
If so, then with parked cars on the road at that section of the roadwaymeasures approximately 22 feet in width, the same as the desiredtraffic calming senerio proposed to be planned for the entire lengthof the street in the DPW current plans to build a 5 foot wide sidewalkon the south side of Evergreen Avenue.
I noticed in your experience with two cars passing and then the Priuscoming towardyou quickly as a car approached from behind while you were betweenScott and Montford (Hawthorne?), you have found that the mostdangerous time for pedestrians on Evergreen is when two cars arepassing next to them as the drivers seem more focussed on clearingeach other than clearing a pedestrian.
Well Hanne, what if you were a MHS student or anyone else bicycling upthe street in that same senerio?
You stated the Prius suddenly stopped completely as did the oncomingcar as they realized there was not room for all of you at that exactspot. The Prius then continued on slowly and the oncoming car waitedfor it to pass.
Had all as described not been on the street, both cars would have beenable to pass each other without any problems. Had you not extend yourarm, you may have been clipped by the Prius at 20-25 mph.
This would be the same case for bicycle handlebars extending into theright-of-way of the proposed narrowed road for traffic calming effectsand the proposed narrowed road to accommodate the addition of the new5 foot sidewalk.
Now I agree with your statement of...If you had been on a sidewalk,with a parked car or not next to you when these cars passed, therewould have been no need to "defend" your space as a pedestrian.
Hanne, the current DPW plans call for a 5 foot wide sidewalk on thesouthside of Evergreen Avenue with on street parking and two 11 foottravel lanes for vehicles.
Where's the room to safely bicycle and wheelchair access for peoplewho need it on the north side?
Imagine your experience at Scott taking place in the blind curvesection between Linden Lane and Ethel Ave!
I think I can speak for all of the residents on Evergreen Ave and inHomestead when I say, "We want everybody who travels Evergreen Avenueto have the safest route possible no matter if you're: walking,running, bicycling, in wheelchair, a car, truck, SUV, emergencyresponse vehicle, delivery truck, unicycle, RV, tractor trailor,mobile home, etc,..."
Sincerly,
Keith Garriott
aka: (The Local S. Disturber)
On 12/15/10, Hannelore Barnes wrote:Since this is a neighborhood forum, I thought I would contribute myperspective as an HV resident, Evergreen walker, and MHS parent. Myintention is to provide a periodic report of walking the street with mydaughters and/or dogs.
I appreciate the earlier head counts of pedestrians on Evergreen in themorning but think things may have been a bit skewed given that one day wasthe week of Thanksgiving and the other was a very rainy day. Those countswere certainly not in line with my own experience of walking to school inthe morning, thus my own report.
Please keep in mind that I have young children who start at MHS at 9am, longafter kids are heading out of the valley to go to school as well as most ofthe children heading to MHS. If anyone cares to provide a report for themorning school "rush hour," I would welcome it. I also want to note that Ido notice whether the cars are MHS or not as I feel the parents get anunjust bad rap in the neighborhood. It seems that any car driving downEvergreen, especially an expensive one, is assumed to be MHS and that isjust not the case, there are many people who live in the Valley usingEvergreen to get out of Homestead as it is the widest and fastest way toMiller. And many of these people have expensive cars too.
I begin my walk at Linden Lane (where I have lived for over five years)between 8:45 and 9am and walk up to MHS with my 4 year old so I only seehalf of Evergreen most mornings.
12/15/10 8:45am Report:
On our way to MHS, we passed two people heading out of the Valley, one witha dog and one with a stroller, no bicyclists (probably given the weather).Given that it was a borderline rainy day, this is pretty typical. On sunnydays we usually pass a lot more people with dogs and strollers and a coupleof bikes.
The car experience was pretty typical I regret to report. Most cars drovethe speed limit which seems fast but I know is actually 20-25 mph. Four MHSparents drove by me and six vehicles that were not MHS, ten cars total. Twoof the vehicles drove in a way that illustrates for me exactly why aprotected and dedicated pedestrian path is needed.
The first was a large four door silver pick up truck that passed us at 20-25mph with an enormous side mirror less than a foot from my head even thoughthere was no oncoming traffic close to the intersection of Scott andEvergreen. I was surprised and frightened that the driver chose to drive soclose to us, particularly my head, when there was ample room on the streetfor him to give us more buffer. We happened to be walking next to a parkedcar in the so I was further into the street than I would be if there were nocars parked. Walking on the strip on that block is just not an optiongiven the uneven terrain and multiple surfaces/landscaping.
Two more cars passed and then a blue Prius came toward us quickly as a carapproached from behind while we were between Scott and Montford. I havefound that the most dangerous time for pedestrians on Evergreen is when twocars are passing next to them as the drivers seem more focussed on clearingeach other than clearing a pedestrian.
I extended my arm out from my body to give my daughter and I an "arm'sreach" of buffer space which I find helps to slow cars down and notice us.The Prius suddenly stopped completely as did the oncoming car as theyrealized there was not room for all of us at that exact spot. The Priusthen continued on slowly and the oncoming car waited for it to pass, thenproceeded towards Montford. Neither car was MHS staff or parent.
Had we not been on the street, both cars would have been able to pass eachother without any problems. Had I not extend my arm, I would have beenclipped by the Prius at 20-25 mph. If we had been on a sidewalk, with aparked car or not next to us when these cars passed, there would have beenno need to "defend" my space as a pedestrian.
The walk back to Linden at 9:45 am was uneventful, there were 3 peoplewalking dogs heading out of the valley and two cars heading into the valleyand one car heading out.
Hanne Barnes
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the GoogleGroups "HEAR US " group.To post to this group, send email to hearus@googlegroups.comTo unsubscribe from this group, send email toFor more options, visit this group atHEAR US is a community service sponsored by http://www.avehicleforchange.org
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Fwd: [HEAR US] Evergreen Walk Report
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment