http://hv94941hearus.blogspot.com/2011/02/letter-from-steve-kinsey-to-homestead.htmlDate: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:05:10 -0800Subject: Re: FW: Proposed Sidewalk Project, Evergreen Avenue,Homestead Valley, Mill ValleyTo: "Kinsey, Steven" <SKinsey@co.marin.ca.us>Cc: dawn_foster <dawn_foster@dot.ca.gov>, "Rebecca.Crowe"<Rebecca.Crowe@fhwa.dot.gov>, "Mansourian, Farhad"<FMansourian@co.marin.ca.us>, walkbikemarin<walkbikemarin@co.marin.ca.us>, "Crosse, Liza"<LCrosse@co.marin.ca.us>, "Escobar, David" <DEscobar@co.marin.ca.us>,bbeaumont <bbeaumont@co.marin.ca.us>, Keith Garriott<saveevergreenave@gmail.com>, Mari Tamburo, Al Wuthnow
Hello Supervisor Kinsey,
I have received a response concerning the Evergreen Avenue SidewalkPlans Currently Pending and have fowarded the message to my groupslist of Homestead Residents.
I would like to thank you for the update through that email on whatyour position is and what you are doing to help meet the concerns ofthe Evergreen Avenue and neighboring Homestead residents about thestatus of the plans, your suggestions for coloring the concrete andearth tone friendly ramps to blend in with the semi rural character ofthe neighborhood, obtaining a written document that clarifies thesource of maintenance funding, and for specifically asking the Stateto modify the grant requirements so that the final plan is moreappropriate for the character of the neighborhood.
At this time, I have to disagree with your views about comparing thisstreet to the Golden Gate Bridge lanes and to other non conformingstreets in Marin when it comes to an "improvement" that would beintended for our street with the current plans implemented.
Evergreen Avenue is a main thoroughfare in and out of the neighborhoodvalley area due to it's current road width, therefore, I agree withmany of the residents in the area that the plans for a sidewalk onthis street should reflect the streets overall positive roadcharacteristics and aesthetics.
I have some questions that I would like to ask on behalf of thegeneral Homestead residents who would be using Evergreen Avenue on adaily basis concerning road safety for motor vehicles, bicycling, andwheelchair access in particular.
These questions are based on the proposed functionality of the streetafter the currently planned sidewalk would be installed:
1). On being assured by DPW that there is sufficient right-of-waywidth to accommodate two safe traffic lanes as well as the proposedsidewalk, does that include the Safe Routes To School requirements forschool students who would be using Evergreen Avenue as a designatedroute to bicycle on the street and sharing the road with motorvehicles?
2). The county easement for the road is currently substandard atcertain sections to the right-of-way in conjunction with what's onrecord as being 50 feet in width along the adjacent propertiesfronting the roadway from north to south. Therefore, wouldn't anentire survey of the street (including the north side of countyroadway easement of Evergreen Avenue) and a "road feasibility study"be able to show that at these substandard sections of the street (dueto property line encroachments, erosion, etc..,) would be a concernfor bicyclists sharing the road with motor vehicles at theseparticular points of the roadway with the addition of the 5 footsidewalk?
3). The current plans propose a 5 foot wide sidewalk along the southside of the street, which was reduced 1 foot from the first proposalof a 6 foot wide sidewalk on the entire lenght of Evergreen Ave andsection of Melrose. Does the current plan allocate for the sidewalk tobe used by the students bicycling to school? If so, is this proposedsidewalk going to be built and used as a "multi-use pathway?"
[Note: My understanding of a "multi-use pathway" is that they areusually approximately 10 wide and meant for the use of pedestrians,bicyclists and other non motorized means all simultaneously sharingthe pathway].
4). Another question I have is concerning wheelchair access on thenorth side of the street. When the sidewalk is installed, it will makethe current roadway width narrower. Therefore, wouldn't that cause apotental hazard for the use of wheelchair access on the north side ofthe street, being that there is only one ADA compliant sidewalk to bebuilt on Evergreen Avenue (limiting all wheelchair access to only oneside of the street)?
Supervisor Kinsey, wouldn't it be more of a complete "streetimprovement" on Evergreen Avenue if the current SRTS requirement for a5 foot wide sidewalk was reduced to 4 feet wide (particularly in thesesubstandard sections of the street) in order for a "shoulder"approximately 4 feet wide to be utilized on the north side for theensured safety of bicyclists and wheelchair accesss along with generalmotor vehicles traveling on this street (avoiding an accident withanother vehicle traveling in the other direction) while trying tosafely pass a bicyclist of wheelchair on the north side of the street?
By reducing the current sidewalk planned to a 4 foot wide(particularly at the non conforming sections), and with a delineatedshoulder on the north side for a " safety buffer from the vehicles inthe northbound lane," would develope the entire street and accommodatethe safe travel of all who travel this street, while saving all onstreet parking and keeping the project within budget, in my estimationas a building tradesman for the last 20 years. (The road roadfeasibility study would also determine if center dots need to beinstalled). [I personally think that this would cause a trafficcalming effect with these concepts implemented].
This is only my view and estimation as a concerned resident (currentlyin the building trade field) on Evergreen Avenue.
The DPW would have to engineer this concept by figuring if the parkingcould be saved on the north side of the street, without therequirement of losing parking spaces. One suggestion would be to clearvegetation currently obstructing the shoulder areas of the road on thenorth side, and require the owners on Evergreen Avenue with fencesencroaching onto the county easement...to move their fences back tothe surveyed property lines (only if neccessary to ensure sufficientroom for the north side of the street parking). [In my estimation,there's only a few fences that would have to be moved backapproximately 1 foot each depending on the if it is determained thatthere needs to be additional room for parked cars besides the required8 foot in width].
I apologize for the complexity in the questions that I have concerningthis project,, but I feel that these questions are crucial indetermining the safest possible plan for a general safe route toschool for childern, Evergreen Ave residents, and neighboringHomestead residents who use this street frequently.
I look foward to your response and thank you again for yourcontinueous efforts in addressing the concerns of the Homesteadresidents about this project.
Sincerly,
Keith Garriott
(Homestead Resident for 15 years)
On 2/3/11, Kinsey, Steven <SKinsey@co.marin.ca.us> wrote:
Friday, February 4, 2011
Fwd: Proposed Sidewalk Project, Evergreen Avenue, Homestead Valley, Mill Valley
From: Keith Garriott <saveevergreenave@gmail.com>
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment