Friday, February 4, 2011

Fwd: Proposed Sidewalk Project, Evergreen Avenue, Homestead Valley, Mill Valley

From: Keith Garriott <saveevergreenave@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:05:10 -0800
Subject: Re: FW: Proposed Sidewalk Project, Evergreen Avenue,
Homestead Valley, Mill Valley
To: "Kinsey, Steven" <SKinsey@co.marin.ca.us>
Cc: dawn_foster <dawn_foster@dot.ca.gov>, "Rebecca.Crowe"
<Rebecca.Crowe@fhwa.dot.gov>, "Mansourian, Farhad"
bbeaumont <bbeaumont@co.marin.ca.us>, Keith Garriott
, Al Wuthnow 

Hello Supervisor Kinsey,

I have received a response concerning the Evergreen Avenue Sidewalk
Plans Currently Pending and have fowarded the message to my groups
list of Homestead Residents.

I would like to thank you for the update through that email on what
your position is and what you are doing to help meet the concerns of
the Evergreen Avenue and neighboring Homestead residents about the
status of the plans, your suggestions for coloring the concrete and
earth tone friendly ramps to blend in with the semi rural character of
the neighborhood, obtaining a written document that clarifies the
source of maintenance funding, and for specifically asking the State
to modify the grant requirements so that the final plan is more
appropriate for the character of the neighborhood.

At this time, I have to disagree with your views about comparing this
street to the Golden Gate Bridge lanes and to other non conforming
streets in Marin when it comes to an "improvement" that would be
intended for our street with the current plans implemented.

Evergreen Avenue is a main thoroughfare in and out of the neighborhood
valley area due to it's current road width, therefore, I agree with
many of the residents in the area that the plans for a sidewalk on
this street should reflect the streets overall positive road
characteristics and aesthetics.

I have some questions that I would like to ask on behalf of the
general Homestead residents who would be using Evergreen Avenue on a
daily basis concerning road safety for motor vehicles, bicycling, and
wheelchair access in particular.

These questions are based on the proposed functionality of the street
after the currently planned sidewalk would be installed:

1). On being assured by DPW that there is sufficient right-of-way
width to accommodate two safe traffic lanes as well as the proposed
sidewalk, does that include the Safe Routes To School requirements for
school students who would be using Evergreen Avenue as a designated
route to bicycle on the street and sharing the road with motor
vehicles?

2). The county easement for the road is currently substandard at
certain sections to the right-of-way in conjunction with what's on
record as being 50 feet in width along the adjacent properties
fronting the roadway from north to south. Therefore, wouldn't an
entire survey of the street (including the north side of county
roadway easement of Evergreen Avenue) and a "road feasibility study"
be able to show that at these substandard sections of the street (due
to property line encroachments, erosion, etc..,) would be a concern
for bicyclists sharing the road with motor vehicles at these
particular points of the roadway with the addition of the 5 foot
sidewalk?

3). The current plans propose a 5 foot wide sidewalk along the south
side of the street, which was reduced 1 foot from the first proposal
of a 6 foot wide sidewalk on the entire lenght of Evergreen Ave and
section of Melrose. Does the current plan allocate for the sidewalk to
be used by the students bicycling to school? If so, is this proposed
sidewalk going to be built and used as a "multi-use pathway?"

[Note: My understanding of a "multi-use pathway" is that they are
usually approximately 10 wide and meant for the use of pedestrians,
bicyclists and other non motorized means all simultaneously sharing
the pathway].

4). Another question I have is concerning wheelchair access on the
north side of the street. When the sidewalk is installed, it will make
the current roadway width narrower. Therefore, wouldn't that cause a
potental hazard for the use of wheelchair access on the north side of
the street, being that there is only one ADA compliant sidewalk to be
built on Evergreen Avenue (limiting all wheelchair access to only one
side of the street)?

Supervisor Kinsey, wouldn't it be more of a complete "street
improvement" on Evergreen Avenue if the current SRTS requirement for a
5 foot wide sidewalk was reduced to 4 feet wide (particularly in these
substandard sections of the street) in order for a "shoulder"
approximately 4 feet wide to be utilized on the north side for the
ensured safety of bicyclists and wheelchair accesss along with general
motor vehicles traveling on this street (avoiding an accident with
another vehicle traveling in the other direction) while trying to
safely pass a bicyclist of wheelchair on the north side of the street?

By reducing the current sidewalk planned to a 4 foot wide
(particularly at the non conforming sections), and with a delineated
shoulder on the north side for a " safety buffer from the vehicles in
the northbound lane," would develope the entire street and accommodate
the safe travel of all who travel this street, while saving all on
street parking and keeping the project within budget, in my estimation
as a building tradesman for the last 20 years. (The road road
feasibility study would also determine if center dots need to be
installed). [I personally think that this would cause a traffic
calming effect with these concepts implemented].

This is only my view and estimation as a concerned resident (currently
in the building trade field) on Evergreen Avenue.

The DPW would have to engineer this concept by figuring if the parking
could be saved on the north side of the street, without the
requirement of losing parking spaces. One suggestion would be to clear
vegetation currently obstructing the shoulder areas of the road on the
north side, and require the owners on Evergreen Avenue with fences
encroaching onto the county easement...to move their fences back to
the surveyed property lines (only if neccessary to ensure sufficient
room for the north side of the street parking). [In my estimation,
there's only a few fences that would have to be moved back
approximately 1 foot each depending on the if it is determained that
there needs to be additional room for parked cars besides the required
8 foot in width].

I apologize for the complexity in the questions that I have concerning
this project,, but I feel that these questions are crucial in
determining the safest possible plan for a general safe route to
school for childern, Evergreen Ave residents, and neighboring
Homestead residents who use this street frequently.

I look foward to your response and thank you again for your
continueous efforts in addressing the concerns of the Homestead
residents about this project.

Sincerly,

Keith Garriott

(Homestead Resident for 15 years)



On 2/3/11, Kinsey, Steven <SKinsey@co.marin.ca.us> wrote:
http://hv94941hearus.blogspot.com/2011/02/letter-from-steve-kinsey-to-homestead.html

No comments:

Post a Comment